It’s Sunday night as I type this, and I find myself in a strange headspace. With such a short amount of time until Christmas Day, my heart feels warm and open. However, with a pretty nifty ice storm smacking into my hometown, my head feels clogged with worry and nervousness for my friends and family trying to get around and get warm.
Why am I telling you this? Maybe because I’m about to go on a strange tangent and I want to lay all my cards on the table.
This afternoon, I got into a brief conversation on Twitter about what sort of year it was in film. A good year? A bad year? Somewhere in between? I eventually bailed out of the discussion. I did so primarily because I didn’t feel like Twitter was facilitating the conversation all that well, and also because I sensed something else at play. Laced into the tweets was a tone of “Don’t suggest”. As in “don’t suggest title x, y, and z”, “don’t suggest I didn’t get it”, and “don’t suggest I watch it again”. A fair position to be sure, since it likely comes from hearing one or more rebuttals already.
Still, the position that it was a bad year in film runs counter to my own belief to the contrary.
I could write entire paragraphs about what delighted me, what surprised me, what engaged me, and what inspired me – but I’m not going to. For starters, I already have. Thumb through the back pages of this site and you are like to find post after post on a film that made an impression. It’s why I watch and why I write. I watch in the hopes that something will make me laugh, make me cry, or make me think. Always. Whether it’s something I’ve never heard of, of something I’m watching for the twenty-eighth time, I always enter into it from a place of passion and a place of humility. Doing so is what allows me to take what I take from cinema, and taking what I take is what prompts me to write.
So what does that have to do with the conversation, or how good or bad 2013 was at the movies? Only this: That film only gives you what you let it give you, and perhaps the state of things has just as much to do with the audience as it does with the art.
This isn’t to suggest that mainstream Hollywood isn’t phoning it in, since I would agree that they are. However, to that end I’d suggest that they have been for a long time. For many years now, the studios have primarily been interested in cooking a bigger and better cheeseburger – one that can allow them to brag “Over 80 Billion Served”. Once in a while these offerings will do something different, but that’s not what they’re out to do. Understanding that helps keep the expectations in check, much like knowing what one is in for when they walk up to the cheeseburger stand. It might seem like it satisfies a craving, but hours later when one is feeling queasy one can’t say they didn’t see it coming.
What this is to suggest is that maybe, if one feels like they are in the midst of a bad year, it comes down how one chooses to spend their time. Perhaps it’s time to swear off certain genres, certain directors, certain methods of delivery. Perhaps it’s time to find a new tastemaker, someone whose preferences align better. A lot of these critical voices can take joy in knocking around what is bad, but if they’re worth their salt, they’ll also talk-up what’s good. The inverse is also true – that it could be time to stop listening to particular voices. It could be that they love things you don’t, that they are too easy or too hard on what they watch, or they are coming to the medium from a totally different place. Heck, that person could be me – and if it is, happy trails. I won’t take it personally.
Or perhaps it’s time to go one step further: perhaps it’s time to do something else.
I say that from a place of curiosity, since many people who spend hours upon hours devoted to the medium are still able to take good things away from it while a small cluster are not. I say it as a person who understands that we are only put on the earth for a finite amount of time, and that said time might be better spent doing any number of other things than sitting in a dark room for two hours and watching flickering lights. I also say that as one who believes that it’s what we do with the rest of our lives that give the films we watch their swaths of sorrow, joy, beauty, and weight.
In the end, they are just movies…pretty pictures…distractions…trifles. They can come together in good groups and bad groups, but much of that is dumb luck. What’s not dumb luck is individual perception, and that perception is shaped by so many other things. If one side of the bargain isn’t pulling its weight, perhaps it’s time to pay attention to the other side. Or perhaps it’s time to strike a new bargain altogether. After all, as a wise man and good friend once said:
“…go to the park, or read a poem, or eat some french fries with a girl. You’ll be exactly as far along in your appreciation of cinema as you would have been if you’d seen X movie.”
This topic is fresh on my mind this year as I read all the year-end lists of films to see. I’m still watching a lot of movies, but getting out to see new releases has been a challenge with two kids (one of them a baby) at home.
Seeing few new movies has led me to be more selective when hitting the theaters and deciding what to see. On the positive side, I think that I’m enjoying those experiences more because they’re rare. That’s been the cool side effect of the limitations. When you’re seeing three new movies a week, it’s easy to get jaded and start railing against everything.
Lately, I’ve been catching up with some very mediocre big movies (Man of Steel, Star Trek Into Darkness) and don’t feel like I missed that much by not being able to see them originally. My experience may not have been as fresh due to hearing some reviews in the blogosphere, but that’s okay.
Like you say at the end, there’s a lot more out there than movies…
See, but in your case, the opposite is also true. Because your free time is so precious, any selections need to feel that much more “worth it” to merit the time and and money. In a way that can mean you’re betting that much more on the hands you’re dealt.
For my money, I vote that you hold off on the “event movies” unless you hear overwhelmingly good feedback.
There are no bad years. Just better years, and years we make better choices from the increasingly huge menu. If you’re in Toronto and can’t program yourself a good year, it’s your mistake, not the menu’s.
I think some though can get upset by one genre or even one film being disappointing that it will tank the entire year. That’s as much a mistake as saying the cookies in your pantry were stale, therefore it is a bad year for snacks. The year can thrive without cookies.
Yep. You get it.
Here’s to digging deeper into the pantry!
Great post, Ryan. The audience definitely needs to uphold their end of the bargain, and nothing brings understanding and enjoyment of film better than real-life experience. There are also a nearly infinite number of directions to take your cinematic obsession, so I totally agree that moving away from whatever might be bringing you down to the “it’s a bad year” sentiment is a good thing.
Your cheeseburger/mainstream film analogy is also a great one. Can’t expect fine dining with most of what they’re serving, and it’s on you entirely if you expect that and it doesn’t deliver.
“Go out and do something else,” a great sentiment to lead into the family-centric times of the holidays! It’s not just about film.
I think “go out and do something else” is the key to getting more out of any interest: food, reading, art, you name it. Any interest is nice on its own, but when we think about how they fit within a grander tapestry it allows individual context and reward that even the creators didn’t anticipate.
I also think that life is short, and one shouldn’t waste time doing something that isn’t offering much great reward.
I’ve found this year to be a strange one with my connection to film. Of course, I’ve had barely any time to watch anything, so I wasn’t hoarding the latest new releases like I used to – I only watched what I genuinely wanted to watch. And it has been kind of great, because most of the films I’ve seen this year have been pretty good. And going to the cinemas has been even more of a specialty – every film I’ve seen in cinemas this year I’ve loved, and each film is just another reminder of why I’m a “devout follower of the cinematic religion” (who christened me with that title I wonder?)…like The Place Beyond the Pines which had me walking in a daze, Gravity which had me trembling and crying, and today, The Wolf of Wall Street, which had me grinning and praising the power of Marty Scorsese. But what if I spent those times going to see Grown Ups 2 or The Smurfs 2? Hmmmm, one has to wonder. You do get out what you put in sometimes. Which is why I could never be a paid film critic, because I love films too much to watch all of them.
You and Dan are in the same boat: decrease in time leads to increase in value placed on that time.
Something tells me that if we got paid and had to sit through all of them that we’d put an even greater value on the good ones – they’d become that much more delightful in the sea of dreck that Hollywood churns out every year.
Here’s to many more Sundays spent worshipping at The Church of Cinema.