The Ancient Greeks believed that a place called Elysium was where we went after we died. They believed it was another level of existence – one of happiness and warmth – and that it was reserved for those of us The Gods deemed worthy and righteous.
Were those same Greeks around now, they might be dismayed to learn that places of happiness and warmth are no longer earned and shared; they are bought and kept.
ELYSIUM is the story of Earth in the year 2154. By then we have brought so much overpopulation, disease, and environmental damage to the planet, that a luxurious space station named Elysium has been built in our orbit. There the super-rich live in a virtual utopia.
Back down on Earth, a man named Max (Matt Damon) is just trying to make his way through the world after making man mistakes early on in life. One day while on his way to work, he is injured after an altercation with police. In seeking treatment for his broken arm, he is reunited with his childhood friend Frey (Alice Barga), who is now a nurse. When max looks to reconnect with her, she gently warns him that he life “is complicated”.
Meanwhile, on Elysium, a bureaucrat named Jessica Delacourt (Jodie Foster), is looking to both defend the community’s way of life, and further her own career. Whether or not she does it legally isn’t of her concern. When her position is threatened by Elysium’s leader, she decides that a power play is order. For that she will need help from Earth, both in the form of defence contractor John Carlyle (William Fichtner), and mercenary Kruger (Sharlto Copley).
These two situations overlap one day when Max gets injured at work. Turns out he works for Carlyle’s munitions company, and it’s a job that he needs to keep so badly that he’ll put himself in harm’s way. Doing so puts him in dire straits, and leaves him so crippled that only a trip to Elysium can save his life. On Elysium, there are MRI-like machine’s called Med-Pods, and they can identify and cure any ailment that can befall a person.
Not only will infiltrating Elysium require him going head-to-head with Delacourt, Carlyle, and Kruger…but it will also bring Frey and her complications into the action in ways that spark great risk, but perhaps also great reward.
Some of the very best science fiction stories are a bit rough around the margins. They sometimes feel a little too earth-bound, perhaps a little bit to heavy-handed, or contain entire sequences that leave us bewildered. However, it’s those imperfections that allow these stories to stand out. They are not the tales of the gleaming white spaceships seeking out new worlds and new adventures; they are the legends of the grimy, grey, worlds that built those ships…and the people who have to make their way through lives where much is possible, but not for them.
Seeing someone soar on man-made wings is nice; learning about the man who knows about the wings, and why he can’t soar with them is better.
What we’re introduced to with the character of Max in ELYSIUM, is a character who is told early on “Don’t dream”. He is discouraged from wanting to go to Elysium because those who raise him feel that it won’t be his destiny. He isn’t told that to get there he’ll need to work very hard, or be very lucky. He’s just told “That’s not in the cards”. What sort of mindset does that instil in a child? That they shouldn’t even bother trying for a better life? Could it lead them to a life of immorality, or a life where they’ll do dangerous things just to keep the status quo? Probably.
However, in misleading Max so badly, the nun that teaches him as a child manages to do something right. She shows him that while Elysium looks so beautiful up in the atmosphere, the view of Earth from Elysium is equally beautiful. From up there, it’s just a glorious big blue marble, and none of its poverty, disease, or pollution are tangible. She’s teaching him the valuable lesson that so much in life seems desirable from a distance. Whether it’s the distance of physical space, or the distance of time, so many things come with a lustre. What’s important is to see past that lustre, and understand the object of desire for what it is. Only then can one avoid coveting the unattainable, or even that which one should not covet.
It feels like these matters of class and privilege are matters that director Neil Blomkamp understands well. His films come with flaws, often caused by forsaking the science in the name of the fiction. Like his previous film, DISTRICT 9, Blomkamp gives himself over to thrilling action in the late-going, and in doing so drifts away from the moral of the story. While it’s an unfortunate decision since it keeps us from learning more about the class divide – and specifically the hidden costs of living on Elysium – it’s no so unfortunate that it sinks the whole film.
Blomkamp avoids that by giving us a story of one man who never stopped believing that the worthy and the righteous could be rewarded. Max’s quest is both a selfish piece of self-preservation, and a last-ditch attempt at being the man he always wanted to be. It sheds the greater “Occupy Elysium” themes and brings it back down to a personal level…where a person who doesn’t own the wings still finds a way to fly.
Gosh, I’m not sure how to respond to your review since I disliked this film so much. I understand the moral argument the film makes but it always feels so heavy-handed, which isn’t assisted by the over-the-top acting and wonky story beats. The final moments of the film call into question the point of the whole film and character’s motivations to be evil are given no reason. This is Morality 101 and never really digs much deeper. I was so massively disappointed by Blomkamp here. One thing is still true, he’s a guy who knows how to create cool sci-fi weaponry but a decent coat of paint and a decent structure does not a house make. I take particular disagreement with your idea that it is an “unfortunate decision” that they started to leave the moralizing behind, I couldn’t wait for it to get jettisoned and felt like it really never did.
While I’ve had the same complaint with Blomkamp twice now (that he drops the moral argument in his films final acts), I wonder how the alternative might play?
Was Max supposed to give Delacourt an impassioned argument about why it was wrong to be so selfish and inhumane?
There’s probably a happy middle that would have satisfied us both, but I can’t seem to come up with it. I’m alright being one of the few who liked this movie. It’s my Peebles.
Hello Ryan
Great post, makes me sorry I missed it release in Toronto. Hope it makes it to kwt without too much “cutting”.
Next time you come to town, we need to set more concrete plans. Maybe even involving me taking you to a film that won’t make it to KWT.
Safe travels, and again – sorry we couldn’t connect.
Do drop by the site more often though!
yikes. another action flick that avoids the social consciousness, eh?
I might have misspoke – the social-consciousness in ELYSIUM is front and centre, and might well be part of what a whole lot of people disliked about the film since it feels a little blunt.
I think I noticed on Twitter or such that you’ve seen it since this comment, how did it work out for ya?
Dont listen to our podcast about this puppy as I was ambivalent about the film and they talked me into dislike in the end LOL!
I could have been so much more ultimately.
Now now sir – I’m plenty secure enough in my reactions to film to allow a little bit of dissent shake my confidence. I actually listened to the episode on the commute home last night, probably prompting my fellow subway car passengers to wonder what was up with the guy sniggering to himself in the corner.
I’ve been running up against this a lot lately – yeah, “it could have been better”…it also could have been a lot worse.