Note: This month’s Blindspot entry arrives one week ahead of schedule to accommodate this site’s coverage of the Hot Docs film festival next week. While some links have already been added below, more will be added through the next seven days as we draw closer to the final Tuesday of the month, when this series usually posts. Please check in through the coming days as the list of links grows. – RM
A little over ten years ago, a girl I was dating asked me if I was interested in documentary film. Still being at the stage where one wants to seem smart, in-tune, and cultured, I said that I was (“Are you kidding baby – I love documentary!”). At the time, I think I’d seen five nonfiction films in my life – none in a theatre. In a neat little twist of fate, that girl was on to something because the documentaries I went to see with her in the hopes of scoring points turned out to be pretty darned good. Truth was more interesting than fiction. The left an impression on me that lasted to this day, spurring a love-affair with the medium that is now going into its second decade.
The girl? I married her.
Today, for the first instance in almost thirty blindspot selections, I’ve chosen a film that doesn’t have a traditional “plot”. MAN WITH A MOVIE CAMERA instead a series of experiments and vignettes are brought together to form a multifaceted look at one composite day in Soviet life in the late 1920’s. The camera is placed in every conceivable spot high and low to capture life, humanity, society, industry, and the way we interact with all of it. Some of what we see is specific to the 1920’s, some of what we see could easily be happening the moment that you read this.
As a photographer, one of the things I was deeply drawn to as this film played out was the way director Dziga Vertov seems to continually ask himself “Where else can I put my camera?”. It reminded me of an exercise I was given in my photo studies where we had to shoot an environment from all plausible vantage points and angles, including dangling our camera over a ledge and using a timer. The idea was to see how the world looked from other points-of-view, and understand how that affected our image. Obviously, these are ideas that Vertov knew well, since he spends much of this film’s svelte sixty-eight minute runtime with his camera everywhere from the tops of buildings to level with the rails of a train track. What we’re shown is our own world – but from eyelines we seldom experience.
I’m likewise in love with the way the film uses editing to make its point and tell its tale – something that needs to be credited to Elizaveta Svilova. That same pretty girl I mentioned in my introduction always says that editing is storytelling, and her point has seldom been better proven than it is in MAN WITH A MOVIE CAMERA. On their own, well-composed shots of labouring engineers and billowing factory smoke stacks might just be “nice”. When intercut back and forth though, we begin to feel something. We get an inkling of cause and effect. We sense just how hard those engineers have to toil to make that much smoke plume from the chimney. Feelings of pride, or injustice, or determination are formed and a story is told…just by cutting back and forth between two sequences of film.
When you bring that well-shot footage and that clever editing together, what unfurls is a film that feels every bit as poignant today as it did in 1929, with clear influences on films like SAMSARA and KOYAANISQATSI. Documentaries that need very little in the way of spoken narrative, inter-titles, or text to convey feeling, emotion, or philosophy. They need only linger on a particular image, or stitch several together ‘just so’ to make us in the audience think. The result is both wildly manipulative and deeply honest. After all, there is very little being shown in this film that wasn’t actually happening. And yet, what is shown in the shot before or the shot after can alter our reaction to the image (as can the music played underneath it).
In that way, the film serves to underline that assignment I was once given. What I’m being shown is often quite ordinary – beer being poured, trolleys passing by, clocks ticking. However, because I’m looking at them from a different point-of-view, it’s prompting a very different set of emotions in me than they usually would. They make me feel more anxious, more jovial, less static. It all comes together to become less a series of captured moments, and more one complete effort that captured a moment of life itself.
The film ends with perhaps my favorite visual metaphor in film history – the image you see above of the director’s eye superimposed on to the open camera lens. To be fair, it might be a little bit on the nose, but at the time – and to this day – it remains such a poignant icon of what it means to be a photographer, filmmaker, and documentarian. It’s long been said that anyone can be taught how to use a camera, but one cannot be taught “how to see”. Few movies exemplify that like MAN WITH A MOVIE CAMERA. Between understanding the elegance in everyday tasks, and trying to explore new ways to capture it, Vertov “saw” in ways that few people of his time did.
Where some saw people typing, putting on make-up, or folding papers, Vertov saw beauty, vibrance, intricacy, and life. He looked upon so many of life’s most ordinary moments, but saw them in a way that turned them into something extraordinary…and the film remains extraordinary to this day.
I usually post Blind Spot entries on the final Tuesday of every month. If you are participating, drop me an email (ryanatthematineedotca) when your post is up and I’ll make sure to link to your entry.
Here’s the round-up for April so far…
Nikhat watched JUDGEMENT AT NUREMBERG
Beatrice watched PAN’S LABYRINTH
Josh watched SOLARIS (1972)
Katy watched BEFORE SUNRISE
Fisti watched SHADOW OF A DOUBT
Andina watched CITY LIGHTS
Caitlin watched THE SILENCE OF THE LAMBS
Jay Cluitt watched HIS GIRL FRIDAY
Mette Kowalski watched LEON THE PROFESSIONAL
Chris watched all fifteen hours of THE HISTORY OF FILM: AN ODYSSEY
Dani Eide watched THE USUAL SUSPECTS
Dan Heaton watched THE KING OF COMEDY
Brittani Burnham watched VERTIGO
Mariah watched FAHRENHEIT 451
Will Kouf watched DRAGON INN
Steven Flores watched STOP MAKING SENSE
Sean Kelly watched LOCK STOCK AND TWO SMOKING BARRELS
Cristian watched FANTASIA
Shantanu watched AMERICAN GRAFFITI
Excellent post! I really want to see this one. I told myself I was going to watch it like two years ago when Sight & Sound released their updated top ten. Alas, I have failed. Your review has reignited the need for this in my life!
I also love that you add personal aspects into your reviews. It makes them feel richer.
The blindspot posts lend themselves to personal touches so much more, because I’m less interested in talking about what works and what doesn’t so long after the fact. When I drop that angel, it centres the writing more on what I think about…not what I think about the film.
It’s liberating – give it a try.
Though the natural course of things, I managed to see everything on that BFI top ten. When it was first announced, I think I’d only seen six, but eventually I got around to the remainder. As for this one, it’s pretty readily available on Netflix if you have an hour to spare.
Hmmm – back to that BFI list, I think I’ll put an onus on watching THE MIRROR, as that would catch me up with the director’s top ten as well.
The concept sounds interesting – I want to see how it turns out for myself! Great review!
If you like pretty pictures – it should turn out well. Give it a look.
I’ve seen MAN WITH A MOVIE CAMERA many times, since it’s one of the obligatory films to be shown to film students (at least three courses had it in their syllabus). Of course, my most memorable viewing of the film was at the Bell Lightbox, as part of the Essential Cinema series, where it screened with a live score.
You might also be interested in this project called Man With a Movie Camera: The Global Remake, where participants are asked to upload a single shot that corresponds to a shot from the original. You can get more information about this at http://dziga.perrybard.net/
Thanks for the tip! I’ll definitely check that out.
Beautiful write-up. I just recently realized this film is on netflix instant and now I’ll definitely make a point to check it out soon. I knew about it first for its amazing poster artwork, didn’t actually know much about the movie!
If/when you do watch this, please ping me if you decide to write about it afterwards. You’re so much smarter than me where these things are concerned, and I wager you’d have some killer insight on what it does and what it says.
I don’t know why but that camera with the eye shot is so powerful. A lovely review and I’m going to make a point of looking this one up! I love your perspective as a photographer and a lover of documentaries. Cheers.
Right?
Like I said, the visual metaphor seem a tad blunt, but all the same it’s so striking that you can’t help but love it! Such wonderful iconography behind it…both for those that create these moving pictures, and for those of us that watch them.
Thanks for reading Dani – I’ll be commenting on your entry in the series in short order.
Strike! I’ve heard of this movie! It’s actually very high on my watchlist as one of my good movie friends claims it to be one of his three favorite films.
Y’know, I was going to make a crack that your friend had some very highbrow taste. Then it occurred to me; if I’d seen this back when I was an 18-year-old art student, I’d probably consider it one of my favorites too.
This, and Top Gun.
Give it a look – your friend will probably be impressed.
Oh, my friend is actually in his thirties, haha. You remind me; I should watch Top Gun some time.
No you shouldn’t.
Thank you for the link Ryan!
Man with a Camera sounds wonderful! I very much love films and documentaries that catch the ordinary. Every shot posted here is so delicately orchestrated. To think of all of the normal events that we overlook, this is going to inspire a whole new perspective. Love the review and look forward to watching it on Netflix. 🙂
Any time Katy – make sure to ping me as you move through the series as I’d really like to read how the other two films play out for you.
I didn’t know you’re a photographer, that’s great. It’s my hobby, but haven’t seriously shot anything in a while, only instagram, ahah. But this movie sounds interesting. Might look at it in the future. I love documentaries only since the past year.
Well now I want to look at your work on instagram! Point me in the right direction, won’t you? I’m always here for doc recommendations if you’re ever looking for a suggestion. It’s sorta become “my thing” over the last ten years.
I didn’t see all 15 hours in April 🙂 I got the dvd set for Christmas, so have been watching episodes on and off. By the way, it’s called “The Story of Film”
I have Man with a Movie Camera on my watchlist, visually it looks interesting, I reckon I can handle 68 minutes, don’t you think? 🙂
Wanna hear something nuts? Two years ago that doc series played at TIFF, day in and day out they were screening episodes in various blocks, one and two at a time usually…
…until the last weekend.
That final weekend of TIFF, when everybody is tired beyond beliefe and can barely remember their middle name, they screened this doc series in two. eight hour. blocks.
Great blindspot Ryan. I’ve never heard of this film. It definitely feels avant garde, with a little Hitchcock thrown in the mix (although it was before Hitchcock’s time). Hitchcock was good with “eye” shots. Like Katy, I also love documentaries and film that make the ordinary seem extraordinary.
Here’s my blindspot submission. I tweeted it on Tuesday. Thanks. http://www.aspaceblogyssey.com/2014/04/fahrenheit-451-review-blind-spot.html
It’s a beautiful thing, isn’t it? To turn the camera on to something that we all look at every day and come up with something beautiful? When you consider how old this film this film is, it gets pretty damned astounding.
Sorry for the late add (and read) of your post – having some technical difficulties reading and writing from the office these days. Added now!
I still need to see The Man with a Movie Camera. It sounds like an intriguing film and has been on my radar for a long time.
Here’s my Blind Spots post from last Tuesday:
http://www.ptsnob.com/2014/04/the-king-of-comedy-martin-scorsese.html
Dude – I am SO sorry! I could have sworn that I’d already linked that one, but now I’m remembering that it was before WordPress crapped out on me and I had to rebuild the post.
It’s added now – and good call watching one of Marty’s most underrated flicks.
No problem! I figured it was a glitch or you were busy with all the Hot Docs coverage. I’d been meaning to watch The King of Comedy for a long time, so I’m glad that I finally checked it out.
BTW – Ever since linking your post, I’ve been running lines from KING in my head. Thanks for that.