Early on in THE MASTER, we see a saleswoman at a department store weaving through the sales floor modelling a coat. She approaches customers, showing off the posh apparel, suggesting they cough up the mere $49.95 to have one of their own. In its way, the scene is a metaphor for the sort of people who claim to have answers through faith, discipline, and devotion. They too approach the unsuspecting, trumpet goodness, and declare for a mere price it can be acquired. One has to ask themselves, just how much they really need what’s being sold…and whether it’s worth the price on the tag.
THE MASTER begins by introducing us to Freddy Quell (Joaquin Phoenix). Freddy is a sailor returning to America after serving in the Pacific Theatre during WWII. Freddy is a drunk of the highest order, one that crafts his own spirits using ingredients such a paint thinner, photo fixer, and other such chemicals. After unsuccessfully trying to hold a few stand-up jobs, he stumbles on to a boat in the San Francisco harbour.
The boat happens to be chartered by The Cause, a new religious movement. When Freddy is discovered, he is brought to The Master (Phillip Seymour Hoffman). Master quickly sums up Freddy’s boorish condition, seeing his state with a sense of pity and grace. He offers Freddy a chance to work on the ship he has stowed away upon, and further, invites him to learn more about The Cause and its methods that allow for personal growth. Freddy accepts, quickly becoming one of Master’s favorite pupils.
However, not all is well. For starters, Freddy isn’t taking well to the teachings of The Cause – something Master’s wife Peggy (Amy Adams) sees better than most. He continues with his drinking, and never completely gives himself over to the teachings. On the other side of the aisle, Master isn’t doing so well either. Master – whose given name is Lancaster Dodd – is under constant scrutiny from naysayers who believe he has no true answers.
All of this leaves us to wonder whether Freddy can be helped, and whether Master can truly help anybody.
THE MASTER is a film that wants to be both grand and subtle at the same time. It wants to play itself out on a large scale, using long takes and a massive canvas. It also wants to be nuanced and never give its actors the sort of grand, showy scene that involves milkshakes or frogs raining from the sky. Seeing a film that wants to have its cake and eat it too leads to a hard time connecting in the experience. However, when the lights come up, and the hours turn into days, THE MASTER stays with us. We find ourselves wanting to come back to it, and that sort of hunger is what denotes the film as a success.
The films greatest arsenal are its three leads. Phillip Seymour Hoffman can bring this sort of performance in his sleep, but that doesn’t make it any less impressive. He has to stand up and embody pure persuasion – if he doesn’t, the film fails. As Master, Seymour Hoffman is outstanding, both in the way he brings other characters in and in the way he beats them down. Joaquin Phoenix (seemingly back from the dead after the wild experiment of I’M STILL HERE) plays much of this film looking like the gnarled root of a large oak tree. He hunches, he scowls, he fights, and he stews. He goes head to head with Seymour Hoffman and proves a worthy opponent every. single. time.
And then there’s Amy Adams…giving what is easily the best performance of her career. Anytime she is in front of the greater populace of The Cause, she embodies the loving wife. She warmly brings word of good news, and sits dutifully just-right-of-centre. However, its behind closed doors that Peggy’s true colours show, and Adams’ talent comes out. In these private moments, in front of just the inner circle, she shows that she is anything but merciful. Peggy wants The Cause to rise in prominence, and Master to succeed, and should either one of those goals seem to be slipping from grasp, she tightens her grip violently. Both Freddy and Master might seem like dominant personalities, but sit either one down in front of Peggy and she will show you real dominance.
Being witness to three amazing performances is nice, but it doesn’t certify a great film. What makes THE MASTER a great film is its portrayal of faith and susceptibility. The Cause could represent many movements of faith throughout history. What THE MASTER wants to point out is that when it comes to matters of faith, that we should all proceed with caution. It’s possible that through spiritual reflection and ritual, that we are able to do many things we couldn’t otherwise do (free ourselves from sickness, for example). Or it’s further possible that isn’t what happens, but a very good speaker just has us believing otherwise. Or it’s just as likely that what’s happening is that we are so happy that we have pleased a surrogate parent, that our relief brings on a wave of endorphins, and that fools us into a better headspace.
This is what THE MASTER patiently – very patiently – wants to tell us. That faith and devotion, especially to a single living person, is such a thorny path. It’s a path that can be manipulated at will by the leader, and one that preys upon the impressionable. It sparks conversations that can easily be turned into arguments, and spawn friendships that can be discarded as easily as paper towel.
THE MASTER is a personal journey, and like any personal journey it comes with peaks and valleys. It surrounds itself with a very dense perimeter, one that will likely leave many people turning away in frustration. However, once one finds the gate and walks through, they are rewarded with something special. It’s a cautionary tale about the lives we lead, and a wish that we can all become the captains of our own voyage.
Great review, Ryan! I just saw it yesterday (and posted my own take on it), and you seem to have nailed it. It’s a very subtle movie, but it’s thoroughly engaging if you’re ready for it. There were a couple of walkouts in my screening, and I always feel bad for these people that might have come to it unaware of exactly what it was going to be.
I’m still unsure what I think of the movie exactly, as it is so subtle at times I’m left with a lot of questions. But that’s OK, because instead of unanswerable questions, they feel like through thought, and perhaps a re-watch, the movie’s mysteries will reveal themselves.
But yeah, the acting and the cinematography are just unstoppable. Perfection.
Haven’t read your piece yet (but will soon), but I’m sorta surprised to hear about walkouts. I’ve seen it twice and didn’t see one patron surrender in frustration. Go figure.
A re-watch did help – compare the few minutes Lindsay and I spoke about it in “Wicked Little Town 4” to what you read above. In many ways, the core of the film exists between the moments, when the audience has a chance to think about what they’ve just seen. What’s more, as killer as Phoenix and Seymour Hoffman are in this film, I’m believing more and more that it’s Adams who is the soul of the story.
Thanks for reading mate.
My official stance is that I liked the film, but wasn’t blown away. That said, I WAS blown away by the 70mm presentation.
It’ll grow on you – and I too was impressed by the seventy mil.
I have similar regarding the Amy Adams character. I remember walking out of the movie and told my friend that she is the Hilary to Phil Hoffman’s Bill (at least the perceptions we have on the Clintons). She is the one who has the control, you could say she is ‘The Master’. When Lancaster goes astray with his thoughts in the party scene, she is the one who take control.
I still need to see it the second time to get a proper handle on the movie. Will have more thoughts after that.
The Hilary comparison is a good one (pardon me while I kick myself for not thinking of it). And as intense as she was in that post-party scene, it’s her final appearance that *really* cements her performance as something extraordinary.
The woman has to be seen as an Oscar front-runner for supporting actress.
I’m not sure if this is a movie I’d see twice, but it’s definitely worth a few for the incredible acting. Best ensemble cast of the year. Great review!
Did you get to see it once yet Courtney? (I didn’t see anything about it yet on your site).
“Watch it Again” is sort of my mantra when it comes to filmgoing, since I believe it’s in those subsequent viewings that a film;s true colours really come through…both for better and for worse. I wouldn’t necessarily suggest that you follow my lead and throw down full price a second time, but just keep in mind that the film has a lot of nuance and those nuances shine a bit brighter when you aren’t focused so closely on the story.
Thanks for reading!
Looking forward to catching this in October!
Brace yourself: It might feel like hugging a cactus.
I’ll be pairing this with Looper on Saturday while waiting for Nuit Blanche to start. It’s going to be an awesome weekend!
Dude that sounds like an amazing day of filmgoing!
Hum, well, you’re partially right. It certainly is a film that is cautious about faith movements, but I think the film is just as much, if not more about the Freddie character. He’s the actual character the film follows from beginning to end and his story is a very different kind of cautionary tale. THE MASTER is a film of two sides, and you’ve got to understand one to get the full effect of the other.
Part of me wants to watch the film three times in a row: One pass for Freddy, one pass for Dodd, and one pass for Peggy. All three characters have so much going on, that I think it takes paying attention to one at a time until you can get the whole picture.
BTW – loved your review of this. Made me wan to go back and re-write my own.